Research

Research featured on this website was conducted in collaboration with Force Therapeutics, utilized data collected through the Force platform, or independently referenced and incorporated the platform into published work. Credit for all research and findings belongs to the original authors and institutions.

Enhancing Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes with Internet-Based Patient Engagement Platforms

Authors: Justin T Butler DO, Ryan DeCook BS, Joyce Harary, Thomas Bradbury MD, Brandon Naylor DO

Abstract

Introduction

As Internet-based patient engagement   platforms (IPEPs) become increasingly utilized   following THA, a clearer understanding of their   role in influencing clinical outcomes is   needed. This study aims to determine whether   increased patient engagement with an IPEP   has notable impacts on patient-reported   outcome measures (PROMs) and post-acute   care visits.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed 5,557  patients who underwent Total Hip Arthroplasty   (THA) and participated in an Internet-based Patient Engagement Platform (IPEP) from 2018 to 2022.  Patients were categorized based on their   engagement levels with the IPEP, measured as   high or low based on the frequency of   interactions.  Key outcomes assessed included procedural   satisfaction, pain scores, functional and mental   health measures (VR-12 MCS/PCS, HOOS JR.),  and post-operative healthcare utilization,  including emergency room visits and  readmissions.  Statistical Analysis: All data was analyzed with unpaired t-tests.

Results & Discussion

The high engagement group included 2820 patients, average age of 67.8 years   old, 57% being female, and an average BMI of 28.7 kg/m2.  The low engagement group included 2737 patients, average age of 66.6 years   old, 54% female, and an average BMI of 28.8 kg/m2.  Higher patient engagement demonstrated improved patient outcomes in all five  categories: procedural satisfaction, pain scores, HOOS, JR., VR-12 Mental, and VR12 Physical.  Higher patient engagement using IPEP demonstrated significantly better   outcomes in PROMs and functional assessments compared to the ‘lower   engagement’ cohort. Increased educational resources, perioperative guidance, and empowering  patients through active participation may translate to improved clinical outcomes. Further analysis is needed to determine optimal utilization and associated content  of IPEPs.

Conclusion

IPEPs demonstrate promising improvement in   patient outcome scores, procedural   satisfaction, and pain scores for patients   undergoing THA. Higher engagement may also   decrease ED visit and readmission rates.   Further, increased educational resources,   perioperative guidance, and empowering   patients through active participation in these   platforms may improve clinical   outcomes. Future studies evaluating costeffectiveness, optimal utilization, associated   content, AI integration, and application across   other orthopedic pathologies remain desirable   research questions.

Join thousands of healthcare executives, orthopedic surgeons, and care team members who trust Force as their digital care partner.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.